<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When the worm turns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/</link>
	<description>A utopia of randomness and maybe a few things about Invision Power Board</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:17:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sunil Ahuja</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Ahuja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Really nice suggestion.

it should be implemented by all the web designer and seo too...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really nice suggestion.</p>
<p>it should be implemented by all the web designer and seo too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jedi</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/#comment-412</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it will solve any problem. The worm can check for a page AND a board name, whatever version it is : if the board is safe its attack won&#039;t succeed else ... it will succeed and infest it. So, version is not a problem i think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it will solve any problem. The worm can check for a page AND a board name, whatever version it is : if the board is safe its attack won&#8217;t succeed else &#8230; it will succeed and infest it. So, version is not a problem i think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoruglu</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoruglu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Why not make a simple little graphic that shows the version number?
That&#039;s easy to do, skinnable, removable and recognizable and &quot;invisible&quot; to bots...

And everybody&#039;s happy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not make a simple little graphic that shows the version number?<br />
That&#8217;s easy to do, skinnable, removable and recognizable and &#8220;invisible&#8221; to bots&#8230;</p>
<p>And everybody&#8217;s happy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlaw</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2004 00:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/#comment-410</guid>
		<description>That would make no sense at all and be a waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would make no sense at all and be a waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooldude7273/Cybertimber2004</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooldude7273/Cybertimber2004</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 22:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Yea, I&#039;d hate to see it go.
There must be SOME way that google cannot chache it.

Matt, what about that &quot;Bots&quot;: group idea that is in the Tips and tricks area?
It could be an option on a group basis to show the Version, and then the bots group and be set by default to no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I&#8217;d hate to see it go.<br />
There must be SOME way that google cannot chache it.</p>
<p>Matt, what about that &#8220;Bots&#8221;: group idea that is in the Tips and tricks area?<br />
It could be an option on a group basis to show the Version, and then the bots group and be set by default to no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giggsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>giggsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 03:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>lol, that is nasty.


Hiya Outlaw :D

I wonder if there is an IPB one that hasn&#039;t been put out yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, that is nasty.</p>
<p>Hiya Outlaw <img src='http://blog.mattmecham.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I wonder if there is an IPB one that hasn&#8217;t been put out yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlaw</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Good point. Nice solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. Nice solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Griego</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Griego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 19:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Removing the version numbers will hurt those listed as Tier 1 and Tier 2 resources and possibly even resellers depending on how you work that because when asking for help, people invariably forget to mention what version of IPB they are using. A profile field will not help because it is not kept up to date. This isn&#039;t for people who do general feature support who pull money from your bank account, this is for those who deal in products based on your product like those that support their own skins running on IPB.

So if you remove it from the board copyright, it would be prudent to add an ipscheck system for the version. You wouldn&#039;t want to do it in plain text because that is just as bad as putting it in the copyright. You could do a plain image but you can byte-check that easily for a person writing a virus. Why not generate an image using the GD security image code, shown when making an ipscheck? That would make everybody happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Removing the version numbers will hurt those listed as Tier 1 and Tier 2 resources and possibly even resellers depending on how you work that because when asking for help, people invariably forget to mention what version of IPB they are using. A profile field will not help because it is not kept up to date. This isn&#8217;t for people who do general feature support who pull money from your bank account, this is for those who deal in products based on your product like those that support their own skins running on IPB.</p>
<p>So if you remove it from the board copyright, it would be prudent to add an ipscheck system for the version. You wouldn&#8217;t want to do it in plain text because that is just as bad as putting it in the copyright. You could do a plain image but you can byte-check that easily for a person writing a virus. Why not generate an image using the GD security image code, shown when making an ipscheck? That would make everybody happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlaw</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Would be a good move. Any issues that may come up with 2.1 would be harder to exploit, and wouldn&#039;t be in googles cache.

Grant people shouldn&#039;t consider this as an easy way out of upgrading. You need to upgrade you&#039;re version as soon as possible when security updates are released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be a good move. Any issues that may come up with 2.1 would be harder to exploit, and wouldn&#8217;t be in googles cache.</p>
<p>Grant people shouldn&#8217;t consider this as an easy way out of upgrading. You need to upgrade you&#8217;re version as soon as possible when security updates are released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2004/12/22/when-the-worm-turns/#comment-404</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s likely that as of IPB 2.1, the version number won&#039;t be shown in the public facing side of the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s likely that as of IPB 2.1, the version number won&#8217;t be shown in the public facing side of the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
