<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Persistent Topic Marking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/</link>
	<description>A utopia of randomness and maybe a few things about Invision Power Board</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:32:24 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 22:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/#comment-822</guid>
		<description>As Dan said... it helps for the lazy people.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Dan said&#8230; it helps for the lazy people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/comment-page-1/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 16:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/#comment-821</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see that too... Being incredibly lazy and impatient, I tend to use Fast Reply a lot, so this would be ideal for me ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see that too&#8230; Being incredibly lazy and impatient, I tend to use Fast Reply a lot, so this would be ideal for me <img src='http://blog.mattmecham.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Systems</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Systems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 15:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Editing on click seems like a good idea, not important but a nice suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editing on click seems like a good idea, not important but a nice suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/comment-page-1/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/#comment-819</guid>
		<description>I guess, but I do like what cooldude and cybertimber suggested. Kind of like the mod that I use called &quot;Quick Edit&quot; where you can click a button and it opens a small window to edit the post. 

I just think it would be more convenient, and since this release is really about &quot;simplifying&quot; things...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess, but I do like what cooldude and cybertimber suggested. Kind of like the mod that I use called &#8220;Quick Edit&#8221; where you can click a button and it opens a small window to edit the post. </p>
<p>I just think it would be more convenient, and since this release is really about &#8220;simplifying&#8221; things&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/comment-page-1/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 10:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/#comment-818</guid>
		<description>Logan, I think that would be taking it a little too far. It&#039;s really not that hard to click the &quot;Edit&quot; button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logan, I think that would be taking it a little too far. It&#8217;s really not that hard to click the &#8220;Edit&#8221; button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybdertimber2005 and Cooldude7273</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/comment-page-1/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybdertimber2005 and Cooldude7273</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 02:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/#comment-817</guid>
		<description>RE: Double Click on post

Not liking that idea... maybe click a button below the post (like the current edit button?) and edit away without reload... but just click on a post?  NO.  Think of people with parkinsans (spelling?).  Heck, I dont have it but I have gotten used to clicking on a window before using my scroll wheel because my window goes deactive after a bit :\
And I dont want to be looking at the topic log later and say &quot;Huh.. I dont remember editing 14 posts here!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Double Click on post</p>
<p>Not liking that idea&#8230; maybe click a button below the post (like the current edit button?) and edit away without reload&#8230; but just click on a post?  NO.  Think of people with parkinsans (spelling?).  Heck, I dont have it but I have gotten used to clicking on a window before using my scroll wheel because my window goes deactive after a bit :\<br />
And I dont want to be looking at the topic log later and say &#8220;Huh.. I dont remember editing 14 posts here!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/comment-page-1/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/#comment-816</guid>
		<description>I would like to be able to &quot;quick edit&quot; posts by double clicking on their content if that was possible, and if it wasn&#039;t hard have the RTE load  as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to be able to &#8220;quick edit&#8221; posts by double clicking on their content if that was possible, and if it wasn&#8217;t hard have the RTE load  as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikee</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/comment-page-1/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>mikee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/#comment-815</guid>
		<description>[quote]Matt, could you add the possibilty to edit one&#039;s own profile by double clicking on the field ?[/quote]

Or is there an easy way to achieve that now, with the completed IPB-ajax classes ? (are the topic fields checked, for lenght input for example ?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]Matt, could you add the possibilty to edit one&#8217;s own profile by double clicking on the field ?[/quote]</p>
<p>Or is there an easy way to achieve that now, with the completed IPB-ajax classes ? (are the topic fields checked, for lenght input for example ?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mez</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/comment-page-1/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Mez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/#comment-814</guid>
		<description>Why is the user management under &quot;content management&quot; shoudlnt it be under &quot;admin2 *shrugs*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the user management under &#8220;content management&#8221; shoudlnt it be under &#8220;admin2 *shrugs*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/comment-page-1/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmecham.com/blog1/2005/04/28/persistent-topic-marking/#comment-813</guid>
		<description>Quite honestly, I am not sure why that per-admin section feature was not added in the first place.
Possibly a feature that was not contemplated until now?
Either way, very nice.

Chad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite honestly, I am not sure why that per-admin section feature was not added in the first place.<br />
Possibly a feature that was not contemplated until now?<br />
Either way, very nice.</p>
<p>Chad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
