<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Networking And Forums</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/</link>
	<description>A utopia of randomness and maybe a few things about Invision Power Board</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:12:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-7185</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattmecham.com/?p=220#comment-7185</guid>
		<description>Yes Matt but I don’t have the same opinion with you on that. I speak follow what has been successful and well accepted by common net. It is better to try out something that is successful than creating a new thing and wishing it would be well liked. Most of the forum users don’t look for the features of a forum e.g. if add as friend is able to be seen graphically, it is more likely that it will be clicked. I know this feature is still there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Matt but I don’t have the same opinion with you on that. I speak follow what has been successful and well accepted by common net. It is better to try out something that is successful than creating a new thing and wishing it would be well liked. Most of the forum users don’t look for the features of a forum e.g. if add as friend is able to be seen graphically, it is more likely that it will be clicked. I know this feature is still there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon Kozlowski</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-7180</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon Kozlowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattmecham.com/?p=220#comment-7180</guid>
		<description>...or, at the very least, have a social sub-section of your own website to allow plugin developers to submit their own creations in a digg-style, community oriented voting system (thumbs up - good idea, it works, not buggy, etc...; or thumbs down) with possible feedback.  It&#039;s an easy way to advertise ways to extend a forum (without sullying your own code) without causing users to use a search engine, and it adds a community aspect - plus it makes it easier to filter the good plugins from the bad since the community would do the work for you.

Again: talking in general here, not necessarily about IPB. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;or, at the very least, have a social sub-section of your own website to allow plugin developers to submit their own creations in a digg-style, community oriented voting system (thumbs up &#8211; good idea, it works, not buggy, etc&#8230;; or thumbs down) with possible feedback.  It&#8217;s an easy way to advertise ways to extend a forum (without sullying your own code) without causing users to use a search engine, and it adds a community aspect &#8211; plus it makes it easier to filter the good plugins from the bad since the community would do the work for you.</p>
<p>Again: talking in general here, not necessarily about IPB. <img src='http://blog.mattmecham.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon Kozlowski</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-7179</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon Kozlowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattmecham.com/?p=220#comment-7179</guid>
		<description>I agree with what you say about the &quot;social&quot; movement and forums, except one small thing.

Innovate whenever possible.  Use new technologies and new ideas to help innovate.  (I know you guys do, but you&#039;re not talking as IPB developer.)

For instance: &quot;I enjoy nothing more than inventing hilarious status updates and uploading photos to my Facebook profile knowing that everyone I’m “networked” with can see them and reply to them.&quot;

Okay, so try to incorporate something like OpenID and OpenAuth that also have image sharing options (perhaps Google&#039;s social?).  Whenever images are shared via their blog or other logged in accounts, if they&#039;re using OpenID (and registered it with the forum), it&#039;ll update on their profile pages.  Automatic interaction, and social reaction...and you don&#039;t have to sully yourself (necessarily) with Facebook.

Just a random thought and/or possibility.  ;)  I prefer to use a forum for communication, not for sharing baby pictures, but whatever floats your boat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with what you say about the &#8220;social&#8221; movement and forums, except one small thing.</p>
<p>Innovate whenever possible.  Use new technologies and new ideas to help innovate.  (I know you guys do, but you&#8217;re not talking as IPB developer.)</p>
<p>For instance: &#8220;I enjoy nothing more than inventing hilarious status updates and uploading photos to my Facebook profile knowing that everyone I’m “networked” with can see them and reply to them.&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay, so try to incorporate something like OpenID and OpenAuth that also have image sharing options (perhaps Google&#8217;s social?).  Whenever images are shared via their blog or other logged in accounts, if they&#8217;re using OpenID (and registered it with the forum), it&#8217;ll update on their profile pages.  Automatic interaction, and social reaction&#8230;and you don&#8217;t have to sully yourself (necessarily) with Facebook.</p>
<p>Just a random thought and/or possibility.  <img src='http://blog.mattmecham.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   I prefer to use a forum for communication, not for sharing baby pictures, but whatever floats your boat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Mecham</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-7168</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mecham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattmecham.com/?p=220#comment-7168</guid>
		<description>&quot;IPB4 will be years away with no real goals to shoot for.&quot;

Why worry about IPB4? The new framework is very extensible and until PHP 6 comes along I don&#039;t see the need for a rewrite.

IPB4 is years away - but so what? If you&#039;re talking about in comparison to vB; then who cares? vB are mostly catching up with vB 4 in terms of PHP 5 / MySQL 5, etc. and we&#039;re already there.

I wouldn&#039;t use the zend framework either for a forum system. It&#039;s too fiddly, relies on too many file includes and is too large and generic to be any real use. Forum systems get a measly resource footprint to work with so you have to be as efficient as you can be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;IPB4 will be years away with no real goals to shoot for.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why worry about IPB4? The new framework is very extensible and until PHP 6 comes along I don&#8217;t see the need for a rewrite.</p>
<p>IPB4 is years away &#8211; but so what? If you&#8217;re talking about in comparison to vB; then who cares? vB are mostly catching up with vB 4 in terms of PHP 5 / MySQL 5, etc. and we&#8217;re already there.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t use the zend framework either for a forum system. It&#8217;s too fiddly, relies on too many file includes and is too large and generic to be any real use. Forum systems get a measly resource footprint to work with so you have to be as efficient as you can be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-7167</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattmecham.com/?p=220#comment-7167</guid>
		<description>They all have their place - if your site&#039;s membership is large enough then social-networking &#039;sub-clubs&#039; are definitely useful. Most forum sites don&#039;t fit that bill, but there&#039;s plenty of forums with 50k+ members that could make good use of social-networking features. There isn&#039;t all that much left to do with forum base code - write it to MVC standards (using zend framework preferrably - vb4 is moving there), move to table-less design (phpbb3 and gossamer forum has done that), paid-memberships (done) and add plug-in support (done by a couple for a while now). Add that easy interface for CMS&#039;s and something like Magento and what else is left? IPB4 will be years away with no real goals to shoot for.

The difference between facebook/myspace and some of the largest forums isn&#039;t all that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They all have their place &#8211; if your site&#8217;s membership is large enough then social-networking &#8217;sub-clubs&#8217; are definitely useful. Most forum sites don&#8217;t fit that bill, but there&#8217;s plenty of forums with 50k+ members that could make good use of social-networking features. There isn&#8217;t all that much left to do with forum base code &#8211; write it to MVC standards (using zend framework preferrably &#8211; vb4 is moving there), move to table-less design (phpbb3 and gossamer forum has done that), paid-memberships (done) and add plug-in support (done by a couple for a while now). Add that easy interface for CMS&#8217;s and something like Magento and what else is left? IPB4 will be years away with no real goals to shoot for.</p>
<p>The difference between facebook/myspace and some of the largest forums isn&#8217;t all that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cafeine</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-7165</link>
		<dc:creator>Cafeine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattmecham.com/?p=220#comment-7165</guid>
		<description>Matt, 

Big ass &amp; badly written mail sent. Hope you&#039;ll find it interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, </p>
<p>Big ass &amp; badly written mail sent. Hope you&#8217;ll find it interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-7163</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattmecham.com/?p=220#comment-7163</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

I&#039;m right there with Cafeine. I currently run a Joomla content site that tries to imbricate with IPB, but it&#039;s just a pain in the posterior. I want to use the forums as comment systems on the articles, and I want to be able to mark a forum post as an article. That would turbocharge the site and the forums by making it exponentially easier to highlight article-quality content - and turning in into user engagement hooks.

If I had to drop Joomla to do it (and switch to IP.Nexus CM, say ;)), I&#039;d even consider it.

In other words: I also agree with Simon and you that some fashionable features go against the grain. But each site is different, and laying a good groundwork for content integration would go a long way to increasing IPB value.

Best regards and keep up the good work (which does not mean I don&#039;t have any beefs with my 75k member IPB forum),

Miguel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m right there with Cafeine. I currently run a Joomla content site that tries to imbricate with IPB, but it&#8217;s just a pain in the posterior. I want to use the forums as comment systems on the articles, and I want to be able to mark a forum post as an article. That would turbocharge the site and the forums by making it exponentially easier to highlight article-quality content &#8211; and turning in into user engagement hooks.</p>
<p>If I had to drop Joomla to do it (and switch to IP.Nexus CM, say <img src='http://blog.mattmecham.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), I&#8217;d even consider it.</p>
<p>In other words: I also agree with Simon and you that some fashionable features go against the grain. But each site is different, and laying a good groundwork for content integration would go a long way to increasing IPB value.</p>
<p>Best regards and keep up the good work (which does not mean I don&#8217;t have any beefs with my 75k member IPB forum),</p>
<p>Miguel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Carswell</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-7158</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Carswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattmecham.com/?p=220#comment-7158</guid>
		<description>Matt, I think each type of web 2.0 medium - forums, social networking sites, blogs, wikis, etc has its own particular emphasis and slant.  There&#039;s room for them all. I agree, though, that there&#039;s little point in trying to put all the functionality in one place.  This might appeal to those with the &#039;land-grab&#039; mentality of c.1999, when it was thought you could sort of monopolise the Internet if you got your site right, but it doesn&#039;t work.  

On a technical note, though, surely it is possible to syndicate content across sites - Friendfeed does this by automatically linking to my blog entries and Twitter tweets (when I get round to doing any) to Facebook.  

I love forums, though, and have been an avid user of a couple of motorcycling ones since 2000.  VBulletin-based, as it happens.  Let&#039;s hope they don&#039;t mess them up :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I think each type of web 2.0 medium &#8211; forums, social networking sites, blogs, wikis, etc has its own particular emphasis and slant.  There&#8217;s room for them all. I agree, though, that there&#8217;s little point in trying to put all the functionality in one place.  This might appeal to those with the &#8216;land-grab&#8217; mentality of c.1999, when it was thought you could sort of monopolise the Internet if you got your site right, but it doesn&#8217;t work.  </p>
<p>On a technical note, though, surely it is possible to syndicate content across sites &#8211; Friendfeed does this by automatically linking to my blog entries and Twitter tweets (when I get round to doing any) to Facebook.  </p>
<p>I love forums, though, and have been an avid user of a couple of motorcycling ones since 2000.  VBulletin-based, as it happens.  Let&#8217;s hope they don&#8217;t mess them up <img src='http://blog.mattmecham.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morten Z</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-7156</link>
		<dc:creator>Morten Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattmecham.com/?p=220#comment-7156</guid>
		<description>Hear - hear on this one. I am much against adding features just for the competetion. Instead, have the nerve to throw away clutter and improve basic user experience. Less is more, when it comes to user interface.

I agree with cafeine here. So many sites consist of articles AND forum, and integration of these parts is crucial. I don&#039;t think I&#039;m the only one cracking my skull to find a way to integrate my forum user base with my CMS. 

If you could come up with something that allowed you to state &quot;Easy integration with any CMS&quot;, that would be a killing feature :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear &#8211; hear on this one. I am much against adding features just for the competetion. Instead, have the nerve to throw away clutter and improve basic user experience. Less is more, when it comes to user interface.</p>
<p>I agree with cafeine here. So many sites consist of articles AND forum, and integration of these parts is crucial. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m the only one cracking my skull to find a way to integrate my forum user base with my CMS. </p>
<p>If you could come up with something that allowed you to state &#8220;Easy integration with any CMS&#8221;, that would be a killing feature <img src='http://blog.mattmecham.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forum communities vs social software &#171; eme ká eme</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattmecham.com/2008/09/24/social-networking-and-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-7154</link>
		<dc:creator>Forum communities vs social software &#171; eme ká eme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattmecham.com/?p=220#comment-7154</guid>
		<description>[...] looking for a software fix, I landed on Matt Mecham&#8217;s blog and his unscripted rant about the difference between forums and social networks. Which, unsurprisingly, I mostly agree with. BTW, Mr Mecham&#8217;s the lead developer of my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looking for a software fix, I landed on Matt Mecham&#8217;s blog and his unscripted rant about the difference between forums and social networks. Which, unsurprisingly, I mostly agree with. BTW, Mr Mecham&#8217;s the lead developer of my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
